!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Emerging Women .comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Femicide
One of the purposes of this blog is to raise awareness about the issues women worldwide face. Unfortunately women continue to be used and hurt around the world. Today CNN posted a special report about the acts of "femicide" taking place in the Congo. Women and girls (like 3 year old girls) are being raped and brutalized - literally destroyed as pawns in an ongoing war for power in the Congo. As tribes and factions compete for control of the country's resources - diamonds, gold, and cobalt (sold to feed US demand for jewelry and computers) - women are the targets that are preyed upon.

Already having a low status in society, women who are raped are often then rejected by their families. It is emotional warfare that destroys the women and hence the families. Weaker tribes can be more easily conquered. Activists are desperate to get the word out about this ongoing violence against women - but wonder if the world cares enough to come to the defense of dark-skinned African women. Or are we too racist and sexist to even care?

How do you react to these atrocities? Do you think that continuing to advocate for women's rights could help more people get involved in stopping horrors like these?

Labels:

 
posted by Julie at 10:23 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 9 comments
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Sony's "Blood Diamond"
http://videogames.yahoo.com/feature/playstation-2-component-incites-african-war/1231745

I discovered the above link on yahoo -- a surprise to find something disturbing in a substantive way when yahoo ordinarily sticks with celebrity weirdness. It gives you cause to think about buying your kid a playstation, getting a slick new cell phone or even a new computer!

Labels:

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 9:41 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 1 comments
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Family-to-Family Crisis solution
My husband and I, along with 5 other families, recently started a local chapter of Family-to-Family. Yesterday I received the following email from the founder of the organization:

FAMILY-TO-FAMILY NEEDS YOUR HELP!

There’s a crisis at our nation’s food banks and F-to-F wants to help.

Our friends at America’s Second Harvest tell us that their member food banks across the United States are reporting huge increases in the numbers of families coming forward in need of emergency food supplies. At the same time food donations are way down so less food is available to give away. Many food pantries are turning people away altogether, and many others are giving out less food to each person who comes in. People are going hungry.

PLEASE HELP US HELP BY PASSING THIS EMAIL ON TO EVERYONE ON YOUR EMAIL LIST!

Family-to-Family and the Bed-Stuy Campaign Against Hunger have come up with a “crisis solution” to help these families… The Family-to-Family Hunger Relief Registry... a cyber-adoption program where you and your family will be linked to a family in one of the four desperately poor communities listed on our website’s cyber sponsorship page. If you are able to sponsor a family in need of help for one year ($25 per month), please click here Family-to-Family | Sponsor A Family to join our “cyber-sponsorship” program. 100% of your monthly contribution (minus Paypal’s fee of about .80 cents) will be used to purchase groceries every month for 12 months for “your” family.

In an effort to make an immediate impact, please forward this email to your own email list, or to anyone blogging… so that we can, as an extended, grassroots, cyber-community, help feed hungry American families.

PLEASE FORWARD THIS EMAIL


Connecting families with more......to families with profoundly less.
Family-to-Familywww.family-to-family.org
Office: 914.478.0756

Cell: 914.391.3220

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world.
Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."

--Margaret Mead
.

If you are interested in getting more information about Family-to-Family please visit their webpage or feel free to contact me at quakertownFtoF@verizon.net. Also, if you happen to be interested in reading my notes from the announcement that I recently made at our church services about our local chapter of Family-to-Family please check them out at my blog.



Labels:

 
posted by Unknown at 9:15 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 1 comments
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Lily Ledbetter (not bedwetter) Fair Pay Act

Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) and top Democrats just introduced the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which remedies impending fallout from a recent Supreme Court Ruling against Lily Ledbetter, who sued for gender discrimination in pay. According to the AFLCIO blog,

When Ledbetter retired in 1999 after nearly 20 years as a supervisor, she was making $44,724 a year. But as she told a House committee June 13, the lowest-paid male in the same job was earning $51,432 a year, while the highest paid man doing the same work was earning $62,832. She told the committee she had long suspected she was being paid less than the men in the same job, but until she received two anonymous packages showing the differing pay rates, she had no hard evidence of the pay discrimination.

These are words from the Rep. George Miller, who introduced the Fair Pay bill: "The Supreme Court told employers that they could escape responsibility by hiding their decision to discriminate and run out the clock."

Miller is the chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee. If you care about equal pay for women, you can help by making a very easy call, even if you don't know the name or contact info of your representative.

The AFL-CIO set up a toll-free phone number just for people to call in support of the Fair Pay Act:

(866) 338-1015

This number will work through Wednesday, which is the day of the vote. Thanks for helping out!

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 12:39 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 11 comments
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Book Discussion week 2: The End of Memory by Miroslav Volf
Hi Women friends (and friends of women,) sorry for the delay on the book discussion post.

1. On pages 50-53, Miroslav Volf describes a moral obligation to remember truthfully and illustrates this point with examples of events remembered in an inaccurate order. Volf connects this with the biblical injunction not to bear false witness. Do you think remembering the correct order of events is an important feature of remembering truthfully? How do you think the biblical authors viewed the importance of factual truth and neat histories?

2. On page 65 Volf writes,

"to 'cover' or 'forget' wrongs, we must remember them in the first place!...the purpose of truthful memory is not simply to name acts of injustice, and certainly not to hold an unalterable past forever fixed in the forefront of a person's mind. Instead, the highest aim of lovingly truthful memory seeks to bring about the repentance, forgiveness, and transformation of wrongdoers, and reconciliation between wrongdoers and their victims.
When these goals are achieved, memory can let go of offenses without ceasing to be truthful. For then remembering truthfully will have reached its ultimate goal in the unhindered love of neighbor."

I
think this is a beautiful exposition of the ideal situation (given that people/communities hurt and get hurt,) but what about situations of what is known is pyschology as magical thinking occurs, where an abuser seems to change and the victim believes it, and then the cycle of abuse happens over and over again? What does it mean to remember rightly in such situations of contrition and promise of change without lasting transformation? I know many of us have faced person situations where this is relevant and I am looking forward to any practical as well as reflective insights on what it means to love, forgive, remember or forget in these situations.

Labels: , , ,

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 3:29 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 4 comments
Tuesday, November 06, 2007
Book Discussion: The End of Memory: Remembering Rightly In a Violent World
This month we are looking at memory and how the ways we recall painful things can lead to grace or its opposite. Miroslav Volf's book, Remembring Rightly looks at how memory of sin can serve good or evil, and whether it is an ultimate and eternal part of responding to experience or part of a process of healing that will, at least in eternity lead to forgetting. You can read a summary and review of Remembering Rightly here.

1. Have you ever had an argument because of a different memory or interpretation of memory about a hurtful event or series of events?

2. How has memory helped you become a better lover of God and people?

3. How has memory been a stumbling block in the way of grace and healing?

Here's a quote I found espcially poignant:

"In memory, a wrongdoing often does not remain an isolated stain on the character of the one who committed it; it spreads over and colors his entire character" (p 15)

4. What practical ways can we invite God to help keep our memories and interpretations of events seasoned with salt and light?

5 Did you uncover any provocative quotes you'd like to share, or angles that would be helpful for us to explore?

Feel free to get into this topic even if you haven't read the book; the important thing is to wrestle with the ideas! :)

Labels: , , ,

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 12:15 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 5 comments
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Tuesday Book Club - Justice in the Burbs 4
At this point in our discussion of Will and Lisa Samson's Justice in the Burbs, I want to bring up the issue of what stands in the way of our engaging in justice. If we as Christians have been called to act justly and to "be Jesus" to those around us, it is obvious that we have not done a perfect job at this. In fact some people don't even know about justice and others go to churches that preach against it. Justice isn't happening as it should in the church today. So what stands in our way? What prevents us from doing justice, what excuses to we give?

Do we not know what we should be doing?
Do we not know what needs to be done?
Are we afraid of what others will think?
Are we afraid for our safety?
Are we to busy?
Do we think acting justly is too inconvenient or expensive?
Do we just not care?

Let's have an honest and open discussion about what prevents us from acting justly. Sometimes we ca talk about justice but never understand it in the context of our lives. I hope this discussion can help place justice within that context.

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Julie at 10:04 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 2 comments
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
This Holiday Season Go Dark For Darfur!!
A friend's father came up with an amazing idea to raise money to help support the efforts of the "Save Darfur" Coalition. Their mission is to raise public awareness of the ongoing genocide in Darfur and to mobilize a unified response to the atrocities that threaten the lives of the people in the Darfur region. For more information check out this blog post and the newly launched Dark For Darfur website!!

Labels:

 
posted by Unknown at 7:58 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 0 comments
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Tuesday Book Club: Justice in The Burbs 3
This is the third week of this month's book discussion on Will and Lisa Samson's book Justice in the Burbs: Being the Hands of Jesus Wherever You Live. The discussion the last couple of weeks has focused on feelings elicited by the idea of working for justice on a personal, national or global level and the importance of the participation of disciples of Jesus in the work of justice. I would like to challenge us this week to think about these issues in terms of our everyday lives so I have some thoughts and questions for reflection.

1. The byline of this book is "Being the Hands of Jesus Wherever You Live" and the Samson's talk about the potential disruption to relationships when you begin to focus on justice. What supports your efforts to be aware of and address injustice and need where you live? What works against those efforts? What is the level of awareness or interest in your current community, faith community, or close personal relationships regarding issues of justice? Who are the important people in your life that would feel uncomfortable with your increased interest in working for justice?

2. In the meditation at the end of chapter one, Brian McLaren makes the point that the word dikaios, or dikaiosuvnh, in the New Testament is often translated as 'righteousness" instead of justice and thus leads people to focus on God's desire for personal and private piety rather than on the need for corporate righteousness. He suggests that we read the NT and insert the word justice for righteousness. Click here for a list of the NT verses containing 'righteousness.' Read a few of these verses substituting 'justice' for 'righteousness.' Do you come away from the text with any new understanding or insight?

3. If our lives have not tended to be focused on working for justice, the change to placing more emphasis on those issues can feel scary and threatening. In her meditation on pp. 154-155, Christine Pohl articulates the anxiety that can be provoked by trying to live justly in a suburban context. For myself, as a parent living a firmly middle class life in a small city in the midwest, focusing on issues of justice represents quite a change and means a re-ordering of priorities and changes to my lifestyle. What would more focus on working for justice mean for your life? What status quo might be threatened? What might the change look like for you? If you have already made that shift, tell us what that has been like.

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Betsy Whaley at 12:00 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 6 comments
Friday, October 12, 2007
The Latte Challenge
If you drink Starbucks, here's an easy challenge that can make a difference:

Currently starbucks only brews fair trade coffee on average once a month, and if we think that's not often enough, it's up to us to tell corporate people in Seattle WE WANT FAIR TRADE/shadegrown/organic. in house, anytime, everyday, the way we like it.

Let's make it a Latte Challenge!

Here's the customer service # to call:

1-800-23-LATTE

If we all call within a few days, I think we can make an impact and get this topic considered and acted upon with time and a little action.

We deserve coffee with a conscience, and coffee farmers deserve a respectful working wage.

1-800-23-LATTE

Labels:

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 11:52 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 2 comments
Tuesday, October 09, 2007
Tuesday Book Club - Justice in the Burbs 2
Our book discussion for this month is on Will and Lisa Samson's new book Justice in the Burbs. Last week, we brought up the basic questions of what is justice and how we personally engage with it. This week's questions are similar in that they address the "big picture" issues. Later in the month we will look deeper at the more personal choices we make involving justice issues.

1. Something I have discovered in discussing justice issues is how one's situation affects how one sees justice. Those of us living some version of the "American Dream" in suburbia often have a very different perception of justice than those living under oppressive governments or those living in wealthy countries where the media and the government make a bigger deal about these issues. For example if you are living under a dictator in Central America, the words in scripture about loosing the chains of injustice, releasing the prisoner and bring hope to the oppressed are part of your day to day life. You are the one being oppressed, you desperately desire fair wages, human rights, and basic life needs met. Theologies of liberation appeal to you and are at the forefront of your religious experience. But if you live in a place where the poor are not visible, where stories of injustice go untold, and the church cares more for new buildings than the oppressed, you have no reason to even begin to care. Generally in church you may not ever even hear the scriptures that focus on justice read. So how does one become aware enough to care? Where does the average person in wealthy countries go to become educated on justice issues?

2. How does your view of America (or England, or Australia, or ...) shape your understanding of what it means to live justly? Do your political and economic beliefs sway how you think about justice? Do those views encourage or discourage you from caring for the poor and the oppressed? What about when it is your government that is doing the oppressing?

3. Jemila asked in last weeks discussion, "is it realistic to bring the kingdom of God large scale ... or better to work at bringing alive God's love in my little corner?" Should governments be involved on working for justice? Should we only care about those in the smaller spheres we touch? Can both be done? What are the issues involved in trusting say the government to do the work of God's Kingdom?

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Julie at 10:17 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 4 comments
Sunday, July 08, 2007
Hunger and Generosity

My friend pat found this wonderful article about Robert Egger, respected and admired as founder of D.C. Central Kitchen and longtime revolutionary in the war against hunger, recently won the food industry's Duke Zeibert Capital Achievement Award for his humanitarian work. Tamara Jones interviewed him for the Washington Post. Here are some of his thoughts on generosity, change and current trends in charity and hunger. You can read the full article here.


Do 20-somethings give? Is there an age when people start giving?

Both the economy and the attitudes of the younger generation are going to shift. They see their time as philanthropy.

Is there a glamour factor to that, too?

This is one of my major concerns, that what we've really kind of devolved into is almost cause-of-the-year, what's popular, who has the best pitch.

Who's where in the caste system that you see emerging right now?

You have all these efforts to feed hungry children when the reality is there are probably more hungry seniors in America than there are children. These are men and women who fought World War II. These are men and women who led the civil rights struggle. These are men and women who built our roads and a million other things that we owe them a debt of gratitude for, yet we refuse to even deal with the issue of senior hunger in America...And with all due respect, we've been putting children first for 40 years and I don't see any indication that that strategy has really worked.

What's different today from when you started doing this nearly 20 years ago?

When I first opened the kitchen, restaurants donated a huge amount of food. Caterers donated a huge amount of food. And they just don't anymore. The science of food service has shifted in just 15 years. . . . At the end of the day, it's efficient, it's smart, and yeah, we shouldn't waste food, but is that the country we want? Do we want to feed leftover food to working women? The reality is, if you had to pick the face of hunger in America, it's a woman with two kids and a steady job, and she is doing everything right, but at $8, $9, $10, even $12 an hour, that's not enough to pay rent, put gas in the car, get shoes for the kids and pay for food. And we know -- we know -- at the end of the month, she's going to come up short. We have to step out of this charity model, and as nonprofits, we have to start being involved in the political discourse. Hunger's not about food. It's so much bigger.

How do you define generosity?

So much of what we do is still about the redemption of the giver, not the liberation of the receiver. What I'm interested in is the liberation of the receiver. That's how I look at generosity. Generosity isn't giving something so I feel good about myself, although that's okay. I'm always amazed when people come in to volunteer at the kitchen and realize they're having a good time, that it's not ashes and sackcloth...

I worked for this charity that would send money to Bangladesh to save pagan babies. And now, some 30 years later, they're sending back microfinance. Muhammad Yunnis, founder of the Grameen Bank, just won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for lifting 100 million people out of poverty through small loans. That's the difference between charity and change! Now I'm about to take his model of economic empowerment and apply it to D.C. by launching a street-food business that'll rock this city to the core by giving people who graduate from the kitchen's training program a chance to own their own carts.

Should one segment of the population be prioritized over another? Is this a case of discrimination against seniors? Do we feel better about ourselves for feeding children because they are cuter than old people, even if the elderly are just as vulnerable? How should our giving reflect both mercy and justice? How can we honor the dignity of vulnerable people with being patronizing toward them? How can we change create a more just society for ALL people that balances individual freedom with community responsibility?




Labels: ,

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 7:22 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 4 comments
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
Bush and The Obstruction of Justice
Check out this Olbermann video. I'd love to hear comments on what your thoughts are both on the video's content and if you feel there is a prophetic role for God's people in holding our President accountable. If so, any practical suggestions?

Labels: ,

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 4:12 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 9 comments
Tuesday, July 03, 2007
This is sadness.
Below is a post from my blog. I thought I'd share it here at Emerging Women since it really effects women worldwide. I encourage you to view the documentary that I've linked to in the post too.

My prayers are with women all over the world who don't enjoy the amazing freedom that we have.

Heather.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


What's wrong with a court, with the world, when a 14 year old girl is sentenced to 60 lashes for "adultery" and "illegally staying together in a private place without being related", and the man in question is acquitted due to lack of evidence?

Everything.

The story is here if you can stomach it.

I was watching an incredible documentary last night on SBS - Chahinaz: What Rights For Women? [the entire program can be viewed online] It highlighted the laws and customs worldwide that make it difficult for women to be seen as equal in the eyes of men. In fact, in a conversation she had in her own country (Algeria), a male university student said that he basically agreed (with the equality of women), but added that would want his own wife "at home looking after my children rather than running a building site." Even though he agreed that women are equal in concept, he could never translate it into his own life. That says a lot.

I'm certainly no militant womens libber. My husband is the primary wage-earner in my family. I work part time, but I am the primary care-giver to our children and the primary house-cleaner/supermarket-shopper/errand-runner etc. We have a fairly "traditional" model. But conversely, if I found a great job that I loved, that earned enough to keep us, my husband would happily leave his job to take on my current role. If I wanted to own my own property I could. If I want to go on holiday I can. If I want to further my education, the options are there. If I desire to take on another religion or faith, I have every right. If I want to meet with an unrelated male in a "private place", even though my husband would likely not be too pleased, I would not be subject to sixty lashes in a public square. Therein lies the inequality that so desperately needs to be addressed.

God created male and female. Even the bible, in Galatians, written at a time of complete patriarchy, very clearly agrees that there should be no distinction as far as the way we treat one another.

It pains me to see women so clearly oppressed and mistreated. The above is an extreme example, but it shouldn't happen. Ever.

Labels: , , , ,

 
posted by Heather at 1:40 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 9 comments
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Fire at The Simple Way
Re-posted from Mike's blog -

I just heard (thanks Rebecca) that several houses in Shane Claiborne's Simple Way community and the surrounding neighborhood in Philadelphia burned down last night - including Shane's own home and all his belongings. Eight houses burned in all, including the Simple Way's community center where they ran their "Yes! And..." creative arts program and the building and equipment for their Cottage Printworks microbusiness. Though over 100 people were evacuated from their homes, thankfully nobody was hurt.



Many of you will know Shane from his book The Irresistible Revolution. He and his fellow Simple Way members are at the leading edge of a new movement of neo-monastic intentional communities - i.e. small groups of typically young Jesus radicals who move into urban areas among the poor to live intentionally in transformational community. Shane has been especially inspirational to me (I wish I had the courage to live as he does) and our church is actually reading his book together this summer.

Anyhow, while I know that Shane and his friends place no value on material possession and will likely emerge from this crisis more passionate than ever, even still it is a setback for them and their ministry. If you would like to contribute to the Simple Way Rebuilding Fund or to the Kensington Families Fund (for their neighbors who also lost their homes), click here and scroll to the bottom of the page for instructions on how to do so.

Labels: ,

 
posted by Julie at 6:42 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 5 comments
Friday, June 15, 2007
Sabbath and Consumerism
My friend Pat has blogged about Sabbath and consumer culture, linking to an article from the Wallstreet Journal about The Decline of the Sabbath by Mollie Ziegler Hemingway. Hemingway argues that it's hard to maintain a value of a day for rest, rejuvenationa and worship for all people when alot of people want to spend money every day of the week including the Sabbath. I would be curious to hear thoughts on how we might restore a Sabbath spirit and sanctuary from the expectation to do and spend, without becoming legalistic about the whole thing. How do our weekend spending habits impact the ability or inability of others to enjoy a Sabbath rest with friends and family? What could we as a culture and individuals do better in this regard to foster healthy, happy communities and families?

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 8:38 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 4 comments
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Eyes on Darfur
This website was launched today by Amnesty International in hopes of shining a light on the tragedy in Darfur. They have apparently rented commercial satellites to basically "peep" over the walls in Darfur and show the world what is happening. Satellite images are being uploaded in as little as 24 hours after the fact, much faster than what has been available previously. The site shows villages already devastated by forces fighting in Darfur as well as highlights twelve villages that are at risk.

Best of all, there's opportunity to take action by either signing a global petition to purchasing a CD of John Lennon's music re-recorded by artists such as U2, Green Day, Christina Aguillera and Lenny Kravitz (out June 12th).

Take a look and then pass it along. The goal is basically international peer pressure.

Labels:

 
posted by Amy at 10:54 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 8 comments
Sunday, April 29, 2007
Gendocide and the Promise Land
I've been thinking quite a bit lately about the irony of the Promise Land story: in it we find a tale about liberation from slavery into a land of freedom, governed by laws designed to nurture community and respect for the alien and the poor, yet the very haven promised by God is acquired via a divinely sanctioned genocide based on religious intolerance. In the Emerging Conversation with its stress on narrative, I have not seen this dilemma thoroughly explored. How can we find ourselves in the story of the Israelites, to whom this tale is so pivotal while cherishing human rights and working to rid the world of genocide in the name of the Prince of Peace?

Labels: ,

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 9:39 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 12 comments
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
More Blog Stuff
There are a couple of upcoming blogger events that I wanted to make everyone aware of. I encourage everyone to participate as they feel led.



On April 28, 2007 you can lend your voice to the Take Back the Blog! Blogswarm in support of the rights of women to participate fully in all aspects of our society, including specifically online in the world of blogging but indeed everywhere and at all times, day and night, without fear of harassment, intimidation, sexual harassment, online stalking and slander, predation or violence of any sort.





One Day Blog Silence

And then on April 30, 2007 - "Silence can say more than a thousand words. This day shall unite us all about this unbelievable painful & shocking event and show some respect and love to those who lost their loved ones.
On April 30th 2007, the Blogosphere will hold a One-Day Blog Silence in honor of the victims at Virginia Tech. More then 30 died at the US college massacre. But it´s not only about them. Many bloggers have responded and asked about all the other victims of our world. All the people who die every day. What about them? This day can be a symbol of support to all the victims of our world! All you have to do is spread the word about it and post the graphic on your blog on 30th April 2007. No words and no comments. Just respect, reflect and empathy."

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Julie at 3:45 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 1 comments
Friday, March 30, 2007
Stop Cyberbullying Day
From the folks at BlogHer, today is Stop Cyberbullying Day. For many women the internet has become another place of fear. Threats of rape, violence, cruelty and just plain bullying have stopped many women from using their voice. Read a recent story here.

I know I've allowed the pressure of a group of sexist men to shut me up on various sites. I felt it was easier to hide my opinions and let other voices prevail than stand up to a group of cruel voices. I've had the trolls leave sexual comments on my blog (as well as the fundies who tell me I'm going to hell). I try to not let this bother me and just continue to use my voice. But my experience is small compared to other women - the ones who fear leaving their homes or writing anything at all.

Control through fear is one common way for women to be denied a voice. From the outspoken/thoughtful women who were tortured with a scolds bridle for daring to voice an opinion to those who were downed/burned as witches for using their minds there has always been ways to silence women through fear. Now its the threat of rape and violence (complete with photoshopped pictures) that is forcing women into silence.

Hate speech and threats (even online) are illegal and should be reported. But it will take groups of women coming together to say that we won't take this. When we see a woman being bullied online our response shouldn't be to avoid conflict and involvement leaving her to fend for herself. We should support her (even when we may not agree with her). We need to let others know that threats are not permitted, nor are they a valid way to win the argument by forcing dissenters into a fearful silence.

I encourage everyone to use their voice, support women, and take a stand against cyberbullying.

Labels: ,

 
posted by Julie at 3:32 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 0 comments