!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Emerging Women .comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
Friday, December 19, 2008
Hierarchy, Freedom, and Emergent
cross posted from my blog...

I was out shopping recently and saw a baby boy onesie (it was blue, so in the strictly color coded baby clothes world, it was intended for boys and boys only...). On the front was the phrase "Second in Command After Daddy." Now as a good feminist that pissed me off. Who in their right mind would stick that on their baby, even as a joke? Even tongue-in-cheek promotions of such family hierarchy encourage the myth that having a penis somehow makes you more important than women.

If you haven't gathered it by now, I'm not a huge fan of hierarchical leadership (even when it's not based on gender). I prefer flat networked structures that allow for input from all. And in truth, it's less about equality or sameness and more about simply respecting people as people. Letting voices be heard and appreciating contributions for what they are.

So on one level, I appreciate that fact that Emergent Village is transitioning to a more decentralized structure. While some may be heralding Tony Jones stepping down as National Coordinator to symbolize the dismantling of Emergent, it was meant as an opportunity to allow a wider variety of people to step up into leadership positions (as the amusing series of I Am The Emergent National Coordinator videos demonstrates). And as Tony mentioned on his blog yesterday, "Any time you can dethrone an overeducated, loud, brash, white man,people just feel more openness for their own voice to be heard." It's all about reducing hierarchy and opening up the conversation.

But will it work? In brief discussions with other women leaders in the emerging movement, I've heard the question raised if the lack of a central leader will actually help women become more involved in the conversation. Many post-evangelical women still struggle to jump into the conversation, much less assert themselves as leaders. For good or bad, they still seek invitations to come alongside and be a part of the in-group. With no one to officially offer that invitation, the question remains if the women will step up or just remain on the sidelines peeking in. I honestly have no idea. It would be easy to say that women just need to get over it and assert themselves, but that would stray into dangerous psychological territory and miss the point. I don't want to need a man's permission to do anything, but an invitation (from someone) is still what many women are looking for.

So I'm curious to see how the decentralization of power affects the presence of women in Emergent. I'd of course like to see a vibrant representation of women in Emergent leadership. I'm encouraged to hear from some that at The Great Emergence event men at times seemed like the token voice. But to the best of my knowledge, I haven't seen any women making national coordinator videos. That's not a criticism, just an expression of curiosity of where this will lead. I hope the speculation of other emerging women will be wrong and we will see an increase of women's voices in Emergent. But at the same time be proactively aware that the opposite could just as easily occur.

Labels: ,

 
posted by Julie at 12:18 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 19 comments
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Book Discussion - The New Christians Week 2
In The New Christians, Tony Jones explores attributes of the emergent movement. One of the largest components of the movement is its focus on community. People and the cultures we abide in are part of our lives and affect our faith journey. These are not things to be shunned by emergents, but embraced as part of who we are. Two of the aspects of this focus on community include -

- Emergents see God's activity in all aspects of culture and reject the sacred-secular divide.
- Emergents believe that an envelope of friendship and reconciliation must surround all debates about doctrine and dogma.

How do these cultural approaches to faith differ or affirm what you have experienced in the past?

What are the benefits or dangers of placing relationships before dogma?

Do you see these descriptions as helping or hindering "evangelism"?

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Julie at 5:55 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 2 comments
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Book Discussion - The New Christians
Sorry for the delayed book discussion this month, I've been kinda out of touch online since my son was born a month ago. But it's the summer, so laid back is all good right? :)

Anyway our book club selection for this month is Tony Jones' The New Christians. If you don't know Tony is the national coordinator of Emergent Village and so is in a great position to tell the story of this new movement called the emerging church. And telling that story is just what he does in this book. From its beginnings as a young leaders attempt to do generational ministry, The New Christians describes the formation of emergent, its main influences, and the ways it has manifest over the years.

So as we start this discussion I want to ask a few basic questions -

- how aware are you of the emergent movement and its history?

- what manifestations of the movement have you encountered?


Much has been said regarding differences of opinions as to what the "real" version of emergent is. Some say that Tony's perspective is just one of many. Given that emergent isn't a denomination, but an organization and conversation, such differences are perhaps to be expected. In light of that, did the story of emergent told in The New Christians resonate with you or did it seem outside your particular experience? Do you think emergent will ever be a cohesive group or is the diversity present in the movement something to be valued and upheld?

Next week we will explore some of the characteristics of the new Christians that are described in the book, but I hope that we can explore the larger issue of the movement as a whole this week.

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Julie at 5:12 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 9 comments
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
How to Avoid Dueling Jesus'...
...or something like that.

So, I'm going to be spending some of my vacation time this summer with extended family members who are in a different place, spiritually and socially speaking, than am I. If history repeats itself, I will probably be on their short list of people to "convert" to the One True Way (tm) at some point during the visit. ;)

I have absolutely no desire to have a Jesus duel during our visit. These aren't individuals that I see very often in person, and If I wanted to have a religious debate I'd stay home and surf Christian message boards.

During previous visits I've skirted around their questions by changing the subject. Most of the time this works pretty well, but there are certain topics (i.e. "You need to find a home church!" ) that just. won't. go. away.

How do you deal with repetitive conversations like these? Is there a good way to say that topics X, Y and Z are off-limits?

(As an aside, I'm pretty good at saying "no" or "I don't want to talk about that" with family members that I see more often. It's the ones that I see once in a blue moon that I have more trouble setting boundaries with.)

Labels: , , ,

 
posted by Lydia at 9:57 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 4 comments
Friday, May 02, 2008
Women in Emergent
Jenell Paris has a great post up exploring the integration of women into the emergent and young reformed streams. She asks some telling questions. I especially liked her statement -

"If your movement excludes women from full equality with men, then just call it a men's movement and don't try to make me pay attention to it."

Anyway, click here for the full post. I'm interested to hear the responses to this.

Labels: ,

 
posted by Julie at 11:53 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 4 comments
Friday, March 28, 2008
An Interview with Sarah Taylor
So, we recently discussed the idea of posting interviews with women who are involved in one way or another with the emerging or Emergent church. I thought I'd jump-start this idea with an interview I recently had with my friend Sarah Taylor. To the best of my knowledge, Sarah does not consider herself to be Emergent. She is, however, long-time participant at the The Ooze's message boards where I have often seen her endorse ideas related to the emerging church. Sarah is a student at Brigham Young University. Recently, I spoke with her about her experiences at BYU as someone who is not a Latter-day Saint.

Lydia Schoch: What made you decide to attend BYU?

Sarah Taylor: The idea of attending an LDS university struck me as novel, but theclincher was really the price; BYU provides a great education for a fraction of what similar schools cost.

Do the people you've met at BYU prefer to be referred to as "Mormons," "Latter-day Saints" or something else entirely?

Most prefer to be called Latter-day Saints (at least by outsiders). Many Latter-day Saints call themselves "Mormons," but the more respectful term is definitely "Latter-day Saints."

Gordon B. Hinckley, the President of the Latter-Day Saints, died recently. What was your first reaction when you heard of his death? How did your classmates react?

I think the moment I heard about the death of President Hinckley (is it weird that I call him that?) is one of those moments that will end up being etched in my mind forever, which is strange to me, considering that I'd never heard of him a mere three years ago. Many Latter-day Saints my age don't remember a time when he wasn't leading the LDS Church, so it was a big deal for everyone around me. My first reaction was probably mild shock - mild, because he was 97 years old, for goodness' sake, and shock, because he's a major figure in the lives of everyone around me and because it always surprises me when people of whom I know die. Probably my next thought was to wonder what the atmosphere would be at school the next day. And I wondered what the protocol was for the death of a prophet, how the succession would take place, etc.

I'm taking a Book of Mormon class this semester, and my professor threw out his lesson the day following President Hinckley's death and let the class discuss it. Most students said they felt happy for President Hinckley that he was reunited with his wife, some cried and said he'd influenced their lives in major ways, many bore their testimonies that he was a prophet and talked about when they'd first sensed the Spirit confirm that for them, and some asked questions about what would happen now with the leadership of the LDS Church. The general mood was sombre on campus that day and the next, and many student missed classes that week to attend his funeral. I was probably most surprised by the students who had been greatly personally influenced by President Hinckley. I don't know why that surprised me, but it did.

Tell me about a typical day for you when school is in session. How often does the topic of God or religion come up?

Religion classes usually begin with a prayer and a hymn, and about half of my other classes begin with prayers. A class period rarely goes by without some sort of reference to the LDS Church. At BYU, a shared worldview (based, obviously, on LDS beliefs) is assumed, and nothing is unaffected.

I took an American history class my first semester at BYU, and I remember seriously questioning whether I'd be able to make it through college there. My professor was quoting people I'd never heard of (LDS apostles) discussing people groups I'd never heard of traveling among places I'd never heard of. It took me a week to figure out that she was talking about Jews who had (according to the Book of Mormon) populated the Americas. I felt as if I had stepped into another country upon entering that classroom. I was taking the class with people who spoke the native language and belonged to the native culture, and I was entirely out of my league. I think what saved me was that it was all so interesting; here were these kids who were close to my age, most of whom had attended public schools, many outside of Utah...they looked like me, grew up watching the same TV shows I had, and were American to the bone. But there was nothing mainstream about what I was hearing, and that was intriguing enough to carry me through a semester of being the class ignoramus.

In everyday conversation with other students, matters of religion and church are omni-present. Life at BYU revolves around the LDS Church, and naturally discussions reflect that. The social lives of many of my LDS friends consist almost solely of church-sanctioned activities. I doubt more than a couple of days went by this year during which I didn't utter the words, "I'm not LDS" to some unsuspecting fellow student who had launched into a soliloquy about the [LDS] gospel or archaeological discoveries which support the claims of the Book of Mormon (a surprisingly common discussion topic). My disclosure usually sparked interest, and a series of questions would follow (Why BYU? What religion are you? Are you considering converting? What's the main difference between Mormonism and what you believe?).

How have they reacted to the fact that you haven't converted?

Hmm. Well, I have had people lose interest in friendships with me, but it may be awfully conceited to assume that that's due to my failure to convert to Mormonism and not some character flaw of mine. Most people are gracious and kind, but there are definitely times when I sense discomfort. And it's understandable. I've read the Book of Mormon, taken 6 religion classes, met with missionaries, and lived among generally missionary-minded Latter-day Saints for the past three years, and yet, a traditional Christian I remain. I think at times it feels to some people as though I'm rejecting the thing that's most important to them, and so I'm rejecting them, in a way. Then again, maybe that's not true at all. Who knows; this is the type of stuff people don't talk about.

What has surprised you the most about the Latter-day Saints you've gotten to know so far?

How bold and confident they are in sharing their faith. When people think "Mormon," we quickly think "missionaries," but I really wasn't expecting everyone to be so missionary-minded and comfortable 'bearing their testimonies' to virtual strangers. That still consistently surprises me, and I've lived here for two years now. The LDS Church is adept at preparing its people to publicly discuss issues of eternal significance at a young age.

What do you think is the biggest misconception other Christians have about them?

I think probably our biggest mistake has been to confuse contemporary Mormonism with the Mormonism of the early 20th century. They're vastly different. I heard a BYU professor say this year that trying to nail down Mormon theology is like trying to nail jell-o to the wall; it's just not a simple thing to do. This is not what our theologically systematic ears want to hear, and Christians seem to have the tendency, when interacting with LDS, to define their beliefs for them and accuse (or suspect) them of lying when they deny believing in the picture of Mormonism we paint for them.

What is their biggest misconception about us?

I don't think Latter-day Saints realize how united the Christian church is as a whole; as Christians, the phrase "the Church" conjures up for (most of) us an assemblage of people linked spiritually, by virtue of our belonging to Christ. The Church supersedes denominational lines, cultures, vastly differing peripheral beliefs, methods of worship and evangelism, etc. It's easy for an outsider looking at the Christian world to see confusion and dissension rather than diversity, and that's precisely what the LDS see (and I should probably note that we too often give them reason for thinking so). The average Latter-Day Saint, though very unfamiliar with where the differences lie between a Baptist and a Lutheran, is quite aware that there are differences there.

LDS churches across the world will usually teach the same lessons within a week of each other; a Latter-Day Saint in Miami will most likely hear a lesson on the same topic on the same day as a Latter-Day Saint in Tokyo. This uniformity is so important to them that they refuse to establish churches in areas where interest is high until there is someone available to go and organize it properly (which can take years, which is what happened in Nigeria). Given the high degree of organization and uniformity of the LDS Church, it's not hard to understand why they look at Christianity and think, "fragmented and lost" and look at the LDS Church and think, "one true church."

How about your plans for the future? Do you think they will include further interactions with people who are LDS?

At this point, I can't imagine my future not involving Latter-Day Saints in some way, but I have no idea what that looks like. My concrete plan right now is to finish up at BYU and then attend law school.

Labels: ,

 
posted by Lydia at 12:12 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 5 comments
Saturday, March 15, 2008
Theology beyond experience
In my ministry / relational interactions . . ." on the street" research lately I have been running into a lot more wafer thin theology among devote Christians. (Like if you poke a stick at it, (MAYBE) it could collapse like a bubble gum bubble.) For instance, one guy... I'll call him Bazooka Joe, explained that experience precedes (or overshadows) theology. For his faith walk with Jesus this is the deal. No distinction could be made for anybody's experience in a spiritual sense, good or bad. He didn't want to determine what that was, b/c who's to say? It becomes individual, if not almost arbitrary to sort that out, he seemed to think.

I thought about this, but then something didn't seem to quite fit, so we interacted a bit him more. When I asked him about his conversion from atheism, and if that experience would then have more weight, he admitted, logically it couldn't, of course, based on what he said, and what he believed to be accurate about experience.
So experience is. . .well, not like Theology.

How does Theology fit into experience, and experience into Theology?
or for you, does one inform the other?
how?
discuss. . . .
: )

Labels: , , ,

 
posted by LisaColónDeLay at 5:25 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 32 comments
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Book Discussion Forever & Ever, Amen by Karol Jackowski
Well, one problem with being a book lover and the mom of a toddler is that books suddenly disappear when you are about use them, and so this post isn't going to have any quotes. I hope if you've had a chance to dip into the book you've found some gems of your own, and please feel free to share any that inspire you!

In the latter part of the book, Karol talks about the breakup of the old order, with its imposition of sameness, at the cost of individuality and the voices of the sisters. She describes the crisis of community that occurred when after years of oppression, the freedom to dissent suddenly arose, causing the foundations of friendship, sisterhood and solidarity to be shaken, and the cost both of that oppression, and the pain of its lifting after being normative for so long.

1. Where is your community at in the process of valuing the voicing of its members, even when it means the loss of uniformity?

2. What is your community doing or not doing to foster an environment where people are/feel loved and safe enough to stretch beyond comfort zones to include the Other, even when the other is the person in the next seat or pew?

3. Describe a time you took a risk and voiced a dissenting opinion about theology, community or spiritual life? What was it like?

4. Describe a time you did not voice a dissenting a opinion, but felt one? What was it like?

5. Describe a time when someone else's dissenting opinion felt threatening to you? What was it like?

6. What is your heart's urgent prayer for the church/God's people?

Labels: , , , ,

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 7:46 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 5 comments
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
What are your favorite Spiritual Disciplines?
I've started the new (to me) spiritual discipline of lectio divina for personal spiritual formation in conjunction with a project related to grad school, and it made made realize how my spiritual disciplines are awfully mundane now that I've been introduced to so many throughout the church's 2000 year of history of them.

I wanted to see what are your favorite spiritual disciplines?

(If your interested in learning more--- Tony Jones wrote an AWESOME, down to earth, and helpful book/handbook I've been enjoying called "The Scared Way: Spiritual Practices for Everyday Life".)


Which ones do you practice or enjoy?

Labels: , , ,

 
posted by LisaColónDeLay at 5:50 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 9 comments
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Book Discussion Forever & Ever, Amen by Karol Jackowski
One of the main themes that emerges in this book is the issue of blind obedience. We have suffered so much for being/not being blindly obedient to our churches, to theologies, to authorities who come in the name of God, be they spiritual or political. I love Sister Karol's voice because she offers a third way: that of sensing the voice of God in our authorities and in ourselves, our peers and those whom we influence as authorities.

Karol Jackowski writes,

"It's not that I didn't believe sister Beatrice's [her superior] voice was the of God -- I did. But I also believed that we too speak with the voice of God, and listening to what we had to say was an important part of being obedient." (p 149)

And,

"Nothing is more deadly to the holy spirit of community that silencing the divine voice of i
ts members, because it's then that we silence the voice of God." (p150)

1. What has been your experience with blind obedience?

A. Are you by nature a white sheep who tends to follow blindly, even to the slaughter?
B. Are you a black sheep who tends to buck anything that smells faintly like authority?

2. What ideas do you have for how we can listen to the voice of God in all people? What practices and methods of discernment help root you and your community, if you have on, in the Spirit as you seek to listen to the voice of God in authority, in yourself and in all who travel side by side or in your care on the path?

Labels: , , , ,

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 6:06 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 5 comments
Monday, February 11, 2008
Emergent = White Males?
Josh Brown, whose blog I really enjoy, has just started a new series addressing common critiques of Emergent. I'm looking forward to all the questions he will be addressing, but today's is of particular interest (especially since he talks about Emerging Women). The critique he addresses (and disagrees with) is - Emergent is just a bunch of white guys sitting around talking theology. So I encourage the group here to head over there, read Josh's thoughts, and contribute your $.02 (whatever your take on the issue). Have fun.

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Julie at 11:10 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 2 comments
Monday, February 04, 2008
Tuesday Book Club -- Forever And Ever, Amen
By Sister Karol Jackowsky

I picked this book because although it tells the somewhat unique and quasi-esoteric story of a young woman becoming a nun in the sixties, its deeper theme is about the relationships between laughter and spirituality, blind obedience v.s authenticity, finding sisterhood in the face of oppression, and what it means for spiritual pilgrims -- and the church -- to both catch up with the changes in the world and find a new identity as a lover of God in this new world.

Although Forever And Ever, Amen,is the story of Sister Karol Jackowski's coming of age as a nun during the sixties, when, as a result of the second Vatican council, Catholicism and its religious orders were as scented with change as the flower children, change did not arrive *quite* in time for Karol's early training as a Postulate and a Novice.

Sister Karol writes hilariously of her party days in high school, her calling, and its consequences, the mischief common among the ranks of nuns-in-training -- and even amongst certain nuns-in-waiting --at-God's doorstep -- all amidst a quickly changing world and a church trying to catch up and then figure out its identity in the aftermath of change.

Here are some quotes to spike the discussion:

"I partied so heartily in high school that I earned the nickname "Suds" in my sophomore year because of my capacity to drink.
I loved high school because of the friends and fun I found there; it was my first taste of what I now know as sisterhood." (p8)

"...I don't have an undisciplined prayer life. I have a playful God." (p84)

"I learned to keep still in the postulate, and in the silence I began to discover my real voice, the inner voice, the writing voice, the voice of God. With everything suddenly taken away in the beginning, we reached a soulful impasse that through us back onto ourselves, stimulating the impulse for reflection and watering the seeds of consciousness.." (p 71)

1. What do these or any other ideas in the book bring up for you?

2. How does this woman's story connect with your story?

3. What do you see as spiritual interplay between rule following and (holy?) rule breaking in a healthy spiritual life?

Labels: , , , ,

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 5:59 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 0 comments
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Rising from the Ashes - Week 4
We continue this week in our discussion of Becky Garrison's Rising from the Ashes: Rethinking Church. I've appreciated reading this book for a number of reason, but especially for how it reveals the diversity of ways people are rethinking how we do church. The interviews included in the book represent voices from different countries and church backgrounds. The issue that appear important and how the church responds differ from context to context. I was especially interested in seeing how the emerging/missional streams are expressed in different countries.

In my American context I see people in this conversation beginning to realize that not all expressions of the emerging conversation are the same, but we often fail to realize how different the conversation is in places like England or Australia (just to limit it to places that share a common language at least!). While such differences are not the main theme of this book, it serves as a good resource to highlight them nonetheless.

In his interview, Jonny Baker mentions the differences between the UK Alternative Worship movement and the emerging conversation. He mentions too that "one of the huge differences between the uk and the us is that in the uk a lot of the emerging stuff has happened in and around the edges of the main denominations - particularly the [church of england]." (p.18). And Steve Croft of England speaks of differing terminology - "the phrase 'Fresh Expression of Church' was a neutral term. We wanted to find a new useful phrase to describe a collective range of phenomenon such as emerging church, alternative worship, and new ways of being the church." (p21).

And when asked why the emerging church conversation has been going on longer in the UK than in the US, Ian Mobsby replied - "because there is more of a crisis of faith in the church in the UK than there is in the US - we are slightly ahead of you in the postmodern context - and this is why Australia and New Zealand are ahead of us both - as they have an increasingly post Christian postmodern culture." (p. 28)

So I ask the questions to us here -

How do you respond to these differences?
Have you noticed how the conversation varies from country to country?
What are the major differences that you see at play?

And it would be great to hear from our members from around the world on this.

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Julie at 12:59 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 7 comments
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Upcoming at Emerging Women
So we have passed the holidays and from what I have heard many of us are still in recovery mode. I know things have been slow around here recently as life has taken priority over cyberdiscussions, but I hope that we can gain momentum and jump back into more conversations soon. As the last year drew to an end some of you gave your opinions on things you would like to see here at Emerging Women which I want to mention today.

Gatherings

I hope that the small gatherings can continue around the country to help women connect with each other. This is up to you guys to instigate and so far they have been great successes.

The Northwest Emerging Women have their Convergence gathering in February which I highly recommend anyone to attend (I had an amazing time last year). Other gathering are still in the works but no concrete plans are set as of yet.

Interviews

But one suggestion that I want to institute as soon as possible is that of hearing the stories of Emerging Women from around the world. The idea would be to collect interviews from women we admire who are out there making a difference. I'm not talking just about "famous" women, but any women we can learn from and by inspired by. I am envisioning simple email interviews that will be posted here in multiple installments. And while I think it would be great to hear stories from all sorts of women, I would like to limit it (at first at least) to women who are connected in some way (however small) to the emerging church. We so rarely get to hear the stories of these women and I would love to bring the presence of women in this conversation into greater focus.

So what I am asking from you all here are three things -
1. Who would you like to hear from? Name whoever you want.
2. What sort of basic questions would you like asked of these women?
3. And are you willing to contact the people you know and conduct the interview? (we can work out details later)

I am excited about this and can't wait to start hearing the stories of these women.


Book Discussions

And I know we are a bit behind in announcing the upcoming selections for our Tuesday Book Club discussion, but here is the list for the next few months. We have chosen somewhat lighter fare from a diversity of perspectives and all selections are available at the Emerging Women Resource Store. Once again we are looking for volunteers to lead select weeks of the discussions. If you are interested, leave a comment or email emergingwomen@gmail.com. I look forward to exploring these books with you all here.

February - Forever and Ever, Amen: Becoming a Nun in the Sixties by Sister Karol Jackowski

March - A Room of One's Own by Virginia Woolf

April - The Year of Living Biblically by A.J. Jacobs

Labels: , , ,

 
posted by Julie at 1:10 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 6 comments
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Rising from the Ashes - Week 3
This week we continue our discussion of Becky Garrison's Rising from the Ashes. Given the nature of the book as being interviews from a wide variety of people, it is full of various and sometimes contradictory perspectives. But one theme that I found repeated from interview to interview was that of the need for accountability for the church. There seemed to be concern that new expressions of church (like emerging churches) might be prone to dangers because of a lack of structural accountability. Here are a few quotes that address this issue -

Phyllis Tickle - "One of the things emergent has to do, and do soon, is provide some kind of seminary education, instead of simply having people lay hands on someone and say, "You're now a pastor," or having someone set up a blog with a green leaf logo and decide to regard themselves a pastor. Another question has to do with accountability. Some of the gatherings have pastors who may or may not be a tentmaker, that is, who may be making their living elsewhere. If people only have accountability within their own group of thirty or so folk, there's the potential for going off into idiosyncratic theology and/or into a cult of personality." (p. 4)

Martha Grace Reese - "Any time there's some rapidly growing ministry, there are all sorts of contentions, struggles, distractions, confusions, crashes, and burnouts. We all need accountability." (p.14)

- Do you see this same danger/need for emerging churches?
- How do you see such a structure of accountability logistically working?
- Do you think this concern might be greater for those from a high church background as compared to those more familiar with low church structures?
- what sort of accountability do you see existing already in new and emerging churches?


One suggestion that seemed to be a common theme as well was to retain accountability but avoid hierarchy. Many of the voices called for stronger lay leadership and flattened authority -

Isaac Everett - "I love the Episcopal Church and it's been very formative for me over the years, but I'm not entirely comfortable with the hierarchical structures of authority and the way those power dynamics affect the church's culture. Liturgy tends to be very clergy-centric, and the laity are mostly passive during worship. A lot of people out there have become so distrustful of institutions that they have no desire to sit quietly in a pew and listen to an elite authority figure define truth for them. we don't trust the government, we don't trust corporations - why should we trust the church?" (p. 68)

Brian McLaren - "What I think will happen in this emerging church phenomenon is that we'll find a blurring of boundaries so that old hierarchies and institutions are actually part of emerging networks - they're networked in. As a result, everybody has the capacity to learn from, influence, and enrich everybody." (p. 86)

- How do you react to the idea of flattened or horizontal leadership in churches?
- Do you think such a leadership structure would solve problems or cause more problems?
- How do you see such a structure aiding accountability?

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Julie at 4:30 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 7 comments
Monday, January 07, 2008
Rising From the Ashes: Rethinking Church, week 2
By (our very own) Becky Garrison

Rising From the Ashes is an easy book to pick up, read a few snippets between activities or in the bathroom. Each interview question and response is pretty brief, so you can take a substantive quick bite and have something to chew on for a while. If you haven't already, go ahead and pick up a copy. Alot of emphasis is on sacred space, ritual, the creative process and the trend toward a more collaborative, bottom-up approach to worship. This book especially emphasizes engagement with emerging ideas and Anglican/Episcopal tradition.

As an explanation for bringing symbols and materials from the real world/everyday life into worship, Johnny Baker explains:

So living in London I am interested in how everyday life can be re-infused with God's presence. This is part of the journey of alternative worship -- use the stuff of everyday life and culture in church and God's presence will be noticed when those everyday things are encountered in the real world. (p 114)

1. What aspect of life is hardest for you to include in your awareness of God's presence?

2. What symbolizes this aspect of life for you?

3. What ways can you imagine incorporating this symbol into worship in order to sanctify that area of life for you?

Brian McLaren offers this cautionary note about technology in worship, based on the scholarship of Marshall McLuhan:

...when you invent the wheel, your legs become weaker. When you invent the television, your ability to become present becomes ewaker. When you invent the amplifier, your voice becomes weaker. We need to reflect on this powerful insight and ask, In what ways is technology subtracting or amputating just at the moment we think it's adding and empowering? We should always remember that Jesus modeled personal incarnation, not projection and amplification. (p157)

Nadia Bolz-Weber (Yeah, Nadia!) does her Sarcastic Lutheran thing describing her opinion:

"A room full fo worshipers who stare for an hour at a huge video screen (not unlike the rest of their lives) with Tom Cruise film clips and vapid "Jesus is my Boyfriend lyrics: evil."

Yet, Nadia also talks about how her blog and internet community has opened the way for prayer and friendship on a profound level. ..."the prayer part is just as central as the checking their blogs part." (156)

This was a good reminder for me. I can easily get sucked into viewing and writing blogs and find myself disaffected from my actual life.

Here's a quote from an interview with Patricia Hendricks that spoke to me. Patricia is writing about the experience of young people but I think it applies to older adults as well:

Most busy themselves with school, work, extra-curricular activities and a social life. They are tempted by the trappings of a popular culture. They are in constant communication via today's technology, and rarely do they experience quiet...Ritual invites a person to slow down, to be quiet, to look to the mystery. (p 119)

4. What is the most significant ritual in which you participate or would like to participate?


Labels: ,

 
posted by Jemila Kwon at 11:34 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 7 comments
Thursday, November 01, 2007
50 Ways To Encourage a Woman Leader
I've been seeing way too many comments here and elsewhere about how hard it is to find women who are willing to lead in various emerging church contexts--by speaking up front, writing articles, writing books, or otherwise getting their voice out into the public sphere. I'm particularly disturbed by comments by men along the lines of, "I would love to have more women involved in leading (insert project here), but every women I asked turned me down!"

There's something not right in this picture. I know so many brilliant women involved in the emerging church in various forms--women who have a lot to say, women who have a unique perspective, women who have leadership qualities in spades. I find myself thinking that if these women turn down a chance to speak or write or lead in some other way, then the project must not be worth doing. But then I take a deep breath and try to remember that for all sorts of reasons, women's leadership is not as easy as it should be--in the church and outside of it.

So, let's take to heart Mother Jone's advice: "Don't mourn, organize." Let's create a list of 50 ways to encourage a woman leader. (Notice that I didn't say, "encourage a woman to lead"!) I'll start and please add more ideas in our comments.

1. Include women's voices and perspectives from the beginning. Don't plan the event, outline the book, organize the tour, and THEN try to find a woman or two to add diversity. The entire project might look different if women are involved from the get-go, and it might be more appealing to women leaders.

2. Don't just include one woman--include ten. No one likes to be a token.

3. Ask a woman leader what she would like to write about, speak about, sing about, make art about, and then make room for her to do that. Don't just come to her with an idea about what you'd like her to say.

4. Invite women to tell their story as leaders (to you, or to everyone). If a woman isn't claiming and celebrating her own leadership abilities, listen to her story and notice out loud the ways in which she has already been leading. Thank her.

5. Introduce the women leaders you know to each other. Too often, women leaders are isolated within their own churches or networks. Women do a tremendous job encouraging each other to step up to the plate--if only they know each other.

What else??

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Heather Kirk-Davidoff at 8:19 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 21 comments
Sunday, October 14, 2007
Podcast
If anyone is interested, I am on the latest Nick & Josh Podcast. I haven't listened to the finished version yet, but I think (hope) I was vaguely coherent for it. I talk mostly about Emerging Women and some of the issues women face in entering into the whole emerging church conversation. I'm sure I ramble on at points, but I had fun doing it. Just thought I'd share that here since it was our stories and experiences I was attempting to relate. Enjoy.

Labels: ,

 
posted by Julie at 4:17 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 0 comments
Saturday, October 13, 2007
Emerging Women at the Emergent Gathering
So I got home a week ago and have been meaning to post about this all week - but life just got in the way. I wanted to give a brief report of what happened at the Emerging Women lunch at the Emergent Gathering last week. And in case you were wondering, the picture is of Makeesha and me at the lunch. Somehow that's the only picture that turned out.

Anyway, we gave an open invitation to whoever wanted to attend an Emerging Women lunch at the Gathering. Men and Women both (or as it has come to be phrased at these things, "Emerging Women and men who like them"). We had a good sized group show up for a spread of cheeses and organic soup and salad (thank you Sarah Sayles for helping prep). I gave a very basic introduction to the types of activities Emerging Women is involved in and then we opened it up for people to share their stories. The storytelling took up most of our time, but I found it to be a very blessed and supportive time. There was a wide diversity of women present who have come to this emerging conversation from a variety of backgrounds. After sharing our experiences as women in the EC we spent a (very) short amount of time discussing the lack of visible women in leadership in the emerging church.

There were a few highlights in the conversation that stood out to me that I want to mention here -

One woman spoke on how she wished God was more like her father. Unlike the women who try to get away from the Father image of God, she is seeking to understand God in that way. Her own father encouraged her and told her that she could do/be anything. But it was God (or the church's representation of God) that seemed to be restricting her. She wants to see God in the encouraging and supportive role her own father played in her life.

One woman mentioned that for this emerging conversation to be balanced (have equal representation of men and women's voices) everyone needs to be willing to give up something. Be it ego, power, ease - if we care about balance we have to work for it.

Some women brought up that in the emerging church we shouldn't be having to work for equal representation and respect for women. We should just already have it if we are truly a representation of the body of Christ. That sparked a discussion on the way things are verses the way things should be. A couple of women who work with victims of domestic violence brought up that there shouldn't be violence against women, but there is. They are not just going to wait around for the way things should be to just happen because of their inherent rightness. No, they are going to fight to bring justice and make things right. The same goes for being proactive in demanding women have a voice.

And I want to thank Jeff for his portrayal of the unenlightened vs enlightened emergent male. According to his division, the unenlightened emergent male sees that there are so many issues to deal with and hurdles to overcome in moving this emerging conversation forward, so he brushes women aside as an unimportant issue in light of the bigger picture. But the enlightened emergent male will continue this whole revolution by doing his part in helping bringing women alongside as an equal and powerful voice in helping make things happen.

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Julie at 3:52 PM ¤ Permalink ¤ 2 comments
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
New Emerging Parents Blog

Hi all, I'm back from the Emergent Gathering in New Mexico. It was a refreshing gathering of friends and the conversations I had were amazing. We had a good Emerging Women lunch, which I will blog about in a day or two, but first I want to spread the word about a new venture that came out of this Gathering.

One of the sessions I attended was a discussion on holistic emerging parenting. The men and women who attended were all seeking to connect with other parents on this emerging journey on how to integrate our "new" expressions of faith in with how we raise our children. Most of us have felt unable to connect with the typical Christian parenting group, and were longing to find others of like mind to engage with. Our conversation there was lively - covering topics as diverse as discipline, salvation, and how to handle Christmas and Birthdays. We all wished at the end that we could continue those conversations, and so we decided to create a blog to be a spot to do so.

Hence the creation of the Emerging Parents blog. It is, like this blog, an open membership blog. Since we have had so many good conversations on parenting issues here I wanted to share this new resource with you all. Not that parenting topics can't continue here, but just that this is a more focused area for those. It is of course brand new without much content yet, but hopefully we can all develop that together. So check it out, jump in one the conversations, join if you want, and let's explore emerging parenting together.

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Julie at 10:20 AM ¤ Permalink ¤ 2 comments